Usually exhibits are big open spaces, in large rooms with no clutter. This exhibition, although minimalist and clean cut, was a lot smaller than I previously anticipated of an exhibition, it wasn't an open space but almost a maze with a lot of filled corners. I surprised myself being intrigued from the beginning, not reading the summary outside I went in having no idea of what to expect, I found myself looking at a pile of plaster and then quickly moving into a dim lit room with a film rolling, the film was of a man, with fabric bound over his eyes, walking a tightrope between some extremely block flats. In a way it was a statement, I watched the whole film, but to me, this isn't art, more of a reach for attention, a statement to say 'Look what I can do' an event that could have gained a lot more publicity and occured for a good cause e.g Raising money for charity, so i came out feeling a little confused and irritated. I agree that the setting was correct, rolling a film in a dark room that is, it dramatizes what you are viewing, I just don't agree this is a piece of artwork.
So continuing around the room I see various things, none of which interest me, an image over a large light box making it seem 3-dimensional and not a flat image. I stumbled across a stand with an open book and a set of headphones. This piece also left me in a state of confusion, being told to go to a certain page and then a voice reading something that isn't on this page, I didn't understand what I was meant to be taking from this. So I moved on.
I was left walking through a maze-like walkway into a small dead-end space. the walkway was printed with images of a wood or forest, the images were very pixelated which made my eyes feel blurry and again confused. I read the information on this piece, the aim was for the man to try and walk in a straight line for 8 hours. That was all the information you received. And the man in the film didn't walk in a straight line, I took the aim of this as walking in a straight line, when coming to an obstruction, move around it and continue along the same line but he kept changing direction, even if ever so slightly, I didn't get the point in this video, it left me with questions like Where is he going? why is he walking? Why in a straight line? Why just for 8 hours, that''s a very specific time? What will he do when he gets there? And how does he think this is a piece of art?
Then I got stopped back by the pile of plaster, there was a projection onto it that looked like a man climbing it, I thought this was pretty cool. But I don't think it's art.
I don't think the space was correct for this exhibition, although there were two dark cornered off rooms almost, there is a large window as a whole wall, and I think the whole exhibition needed to be darker due to the feeling of confusion and intriguing interests, it wasn't anything that had a light airy feel too it, this window either needed to be blacked out or the exhibition needed to be in a different space.
I think personally I have a very narrow view on what I see as art, I see it as a permanent non-moving thing, like a painting, an image or a sculpture, not a video or a book with headphones. Although the artists achieved what they wanted, a reaction. My reaction was a feeling of irritation, confusion and almost anger. But that's just my interpretation.
Thanks for reading,
Charlotte Davis.







